If you are new to this site, Questions and Answers about Recovery can be a good place to start!
The latest way to sell antipsychotic drugs appears to be to tell people that psychosis will damage your brain, and so people need antipsychotic medications to protect those brains. This claim was recently made by Jeffrey Lieberman on a PBS television show. Fortunately, Robert Whitaker took some time to analyze the science behind these claims, and you can read his column on that here.
This 6 hour course presents evidence based, practical and humanistic ways to help people recover. For more information or to register, go to this link.
For more information, or to register, use this link.
For more information, or to register, use this link.
Check out a few of us exploring both the possibilities and some challenges of using an Internal Family Systems approach for "psychosis"
How We Started the Bay Area Hearing Voices Network
by Ed Herzog
"Voice hearers have created a community. Often, for the first time, they feel safe to talk about their experiences and reach out for support."
. @JasperFeyaerts starts the Too Mad to Be True III conference on the Paradoxes of Madness at @Guislainmuseum in Ghent, Belgium with a quote from philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. #tmtbt #toomadtobetrue #tmtbt3 #tmtbtiii
"What Matters to you?: a survivor-centred antidote to "What's Wrong with you" or "What Happened to you?"
@Mad_In_America
Long read in the Guardian on avatar therapy for #hearingvoices. Avatar therapy uses software to create an animated avatar representing a distressing voice to bring a tangible experience of the voice into the therapy session (thread)
I'm hoping all my followers in the US are either working or donating money to get out the vote - it would feel so bad to let Trump win when he could have been stopped with a little more effort!
The protect your brain argument has been around for a long time. What it does is to scare people like me and my husband into forcing drugs on their children. Madness does look like brain damage to the newly initiated, so it’s an easy sell for pharma.
I think, the first time I heard of this nonsense was back in 2006 or so, when a consumer in a drugs-no drugs discussion with me said: “Yeah, but psychosis wears out the brain.” As I’d never heard anything like that before, I didn’t even get what he meant. Certainly, going through “psychosis” wasn’t a walk in the park, but the brain? What’s that got to do with the brain??
It doesn’t only scare family, it also scares the person in crisis herself. And every professional who hasn’t done their homework (which is most of them).
And if you take into consideration that neuroleptics can’t cure the “illness”, which psychiatry admits, but only “treat” (= suppress) symptoms, it makes no sense to say they would protect the brain. “Schizophrenia” is regarded an illness that causes progressive deterioration of brain functioning, like arthritis for instance causes progressive deterioration of joint functioning. No matter how many pain killers you pop, as long as the arthritis itself doesn’t get cured, your joint functioning will continue to deteriorate. Pain killers don’t protect them from that (on the contrary… )
All you have to do be scared into buying the protect your brain argument is to go look under a bridge and realize that most of the people there had their first psychotic break years ago. You think, oh my goodness, their “untreated” psychosis has led to this. To my mind, what has been “untreated” is the cause, and meaningful psychotherapies have been rejected in favor of the diseased brain argument. If they won’t take their meds, the reasoning goes, they are finished. I like Marian’s sentence about psychiatrists not doing their homework. If you did your homework, you would realize that psychosis is an understandable reaction to human pain.
A contradiction. Psychosis does not damage the brain however the neuroleptic drugs that are touted as brain protectors in fact do damage the brain. Two examples include tardive dyskensia and neuro malignant brain syndrome.